Lego Reviews - standard format?
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Lego Reviews - standard format?
legodac - this is great (see below) Can you (and others) come up with a standardized list of items that people will rank for either reviews ie Ease of Instructions for example for consistency?
http://mlnteam.forumotion.com/t13938-anyone-interested-in-reviewing-lego-sets#275655
http://mlnteam.forumotion.com/t13938-anyone-interested-in-reviewing-lego-sets#275655
_________________________________________

Wishing you a Happy July 4th!

lindavz- Administrator

- Total posts: 6410
MLN Name: lindavz
SPAM Bar:



Registration date: 2008-09-17

Re: Lego Reviews - standard format?
You did it already my friend, Reviews should be in the MOC Board, The MOC's should be there as well, and dare I say Lego...you will loose members, then again you gain them as well, but the ones you will gain will serve to enrich your vision.
Lego is the reason
Lego is the reason

legodac- Featured User of the Month

- Total posts: 640
MLN Name: legodac
SPAM Bar:



Registration date: 2008-11-19
Re: Lego Reviews - standard format?
Actually what I meant what should there be consistent criteria - ie metadata that is seen in every review. Should a review have a 1 - 5 for fun, 1-5 for ease of use, 1 - 5 complexity etc.?
_________________________________________

Wishing you a Happy July 4th!

lindavz- Administrator

- Total posts: 6410
MLN Name: lindavz
SPAM Bar:



Registration date: 2008-09-17

Similar topics» LEGO UNIVERSE JUST CLOSED
» sio2 export format spec?
» Banhammer: Jace and Stoneforge banned in Standard
» DYU Reviews (metal-archives.com)
» [Spoiler Alert] Struck by Lightning POST-WATCHING Discussion and Reviews Thread
» sio2 export format spec?
» Banhammer: Jace and Stoneforge banned in Standard
» DYU Reviews (metal-archives.com)
» [Spoiler Alert] Struck by Lightning POST-WATCHING Discussion and Reviews Thread
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum